Wednesday, November 17, 2010
What Does Low Income Means?
Do you like this story?
Income as economic and political control
Wages more a tool of political and economic control rather than a means for the welfare of workers. From year to year, although the cost of living is getting high, but wages remained suppressed at the lowest position. By fixing the amount of wages received by workers menaing that ruler and employers also pegged the economic and political people power. This will make easier for the authorities and employers to break every strategy that is built by workers in order to establish equality in society.
Capitalists are well aware that workers have the terrible power to control production. Authority was also terrified of the fighting spirit of workers who at any time will control the government. That consciousness is what forced the government and the capitalists struggled to suppress political and economic power of workers through national low wages policy.
Low income as investment security tool
The objective of the capitalist is to achieve capital gains as much as possible by holding down wages as low as possible. National wage policy is always in favor of progress and the security of investment and neglect the welfare of workers. By reason of maintaining economic growth, the ruler always looking for a safe position (in doubt) between the interests of bourgeois and proletarian.
Gain on investment in a country does not necessarily provide a positive influence on wage increases and welfare of workers. The character of capital will always put capital profit to the next investment. So the obsolescence promise of capital that will give bonuses to workers is an empty promise that is always used to lull workers. Economic rationalization is still one weapon to force the unions to agree and accept the concept of capitalism with the lure of social welfare. As long as the state is the incarnation of the greed capitalist, all the capital profit will not be used for the welfare of the people but to strengthen the position of the status quo of a government.
Low income is un-dialogue-able issue
Democracy characterized by popular participation in decision-making. Similarly, in terms of wages, workers who are directly interested in it, must be actively involved in determining wages. So it is not a surprise if in many countries we can find bipartite and tripartite institutions. This institution served to make the dialogue for all types of employment issues, including wage issues.
However, all the ideas above are only touched on the level of ideology and not practical. In fact wages remain the sole authority of the government. Although there are preconditions of wage determination in the form of meetings that are pretty intense, research, and many seminars, but it's all nothing more than a political ritual of state budget expenditures that have been approved by the government that in fact it is the people's money.
Wages, then became the anti-dialogue area. Dialogues which happening is only the outer wrap and rough. But the core in wage setting is entirely in the hands of authorities with due regard to economy and investment security. Welfare workers absolutely not a consideration in the process of wage determination.
Low income as poverty scheme
Wages become a powerful tool to keep workers poor, foolish and weak. It is used by capital to secure the movement of capital by hiring workers as low as possible and workers will continue to be poor. At the time of poor, the workers would be willing to work longer to earn extra income. Risks that directly suffered if the workers are poor because of low wage is that they and their families can not live healthy, the intake of nutrients into the body must be very minimal. In addition, school of the children would not be paid, the children of workers became backward in education that will result in a lack of employment opportunities. This becomes an endless chain of Satan if workers do not have collective consciousness to change
Moreover, workers trapped in a debt circle, dig and cover hole endless. Workers are forced to work harder and longer because they have to pay the debt. Clearly there is no ability for workers to improve their living standards over the wages are still pegged at the minimum position.
Low income is anti trade union
Low wages are always threatening the existence of trade unions. When workers receive low wages, there is a possibility they will soon leave his job or keep working, but longer each day so they do not have time to be active into trade union. Another possibility is the workers will look for outside employment as additional work in order to meet basic daily needs.
This situation is exacerbated by passive mentality that believes that what happening today is better then no job, so, why fight, fortunately having job and wages each month is luckier the others, out there are still many young people are unemployed. This mentality is very difficult to be invited to fight, it is a sign that workers are not aware of the contradictions which exist in the production process.
Low wages also increase stress levels in society. Families to be not in harmony because they often quarreled due to economic necessity was never fulfilled. If the dispute is not quickly resolved, then the divorce is likely to occur. The next result is abandoned children, it is no wonder if (especially) in big cities, the number of street children are getting a lot. They do not go to school because they had to be street singer for the rampage of life.
Even if parents do not divorce, but both had to work from morning till night, so they do not have quality time for their children. Children no longer get attention because their parents came home exhausted after working late at night. In another part, especially in developed countries like Japan, low-wage workers are not confident to get married, they were pressured by the shadow of miserable family life, the birth rate is very low and even not impossible will happen lost of generation. This self-distrust also trigger high rates of youth suicide, they feel they have no value in society because they can not have what they want because their wages are very low.
This post was written by: Franklin Manuel
Franklin Manuel is a professional blogger, web designer and front end web developer. Follow him on Twitter
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Responses to “What Does Low Income Means?”
Post a Comment